- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:53:16 -0400
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Monday, 2009 July 27 8:49 > To: Grosso, Paul > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition > > Grosso, Paul writes: > > > Things are looking good, but one more housekeeping chore. Re: > > > > We closed NPE20 and NPE22 with no action needed; Paul informed I18N: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0055 > > > > ACTION to Henry: Close NPE20 and NPE22 with no action/changes. > > Done == recorded in [1]. Thanks. > > > We had CONSENSUS not to add ns prefix undeclaration to NS 1.0 3rd Ed. > > Paul informed XML Security at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0054 > > and Frederick replied (with no concerns) at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0058 > > Not clear what you want me to do wrt this one. . . That was just the record of our decision to close NPE 20 and 22, that was not a separate action. thanks, paul > > ht > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 13:54:09 UTC