- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:31:08 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- Konrad John Paul Richard Norm Henry [6 organizations (6 with proxies) present out of 9] Regrets ------- Glenn Absent organizations -------------------- François Yergeau Daniel Veillard > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > October Technical Plenary > ------------------------- > The next Technical Plenary is scheduled for October in Cannes: > http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html > We have tentatively decided to meet there. > > > 3. C14N > > The C14N 1.1 PR has been published: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-xml-c14n11-20080129/ > We note that the PR period ended 2008 March 7. ACTION to Henry: Lead the process of developing a director's decision. ACTION to Konrad, Henry: Consider the following question: Is c14n11(c14n11(xmlfile)) == c14n11(xmlfile)? After some research, Henry believes there is no problem with namespace prefixes, so he now suspects that c14n11(c14n11(xmlfile)) == c14n11(xmlfile). > Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0) WG Note > has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-C14N-issues-20061220/ > > Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment > WG Note has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-DSig-usage-20061220/ > > > 4. XML 1.0 5th Edition > > The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ > > > 5. XML 1.0/1.1 4th/2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816 > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816 > > Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > These need to be resolved. > > Richard reports that the 2005 issue has been resolved in the > latest draft. > > The one from 2006, character references with numbers with > dozens of digits, may not be. > > ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. > > At some point in the future (e.g., six months after XML 1.0 5th > Edition is a Recommendation) we might consider deprecating XML 1.1. > > > 6. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > > Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816 > > Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816 > > Richard has recorded Anne's issue/proposed resolution at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata#NPE27 > > ACTION to Richard: Look into Anne's (two) comments at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2007Oct/ > > --- > > We discussed processing an erratum to NS 1.0 that adds the > ability to undeclare a namespace prefix in NS 1.0. > > We could probably make NS 1.0 a copy of NS 1.1 with appropriate > minor changes. > > --- > > We have another NS 1.0 potential erratum about > 'Letter' -> 'NameStartChar' at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2008Mar/0000 > We should address this in our upcoming next edition of NS 1.0. > > 7. LEIRIs > > Martin's latest IRI draft (defining LEIRIs in section 7) is at > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt > > Martin's latest email is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0042 > > Paul's summary of what comes next spec-by-spec is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > > It might be time to ping Martin again now that we have both > XML Base PER and XLink 1.1 LC published. ACTION to Henry: Do some pinging about the schedule of IRI bis. We should be sure XLink spells out Legacy Extended IRIs and that IRI bis mentions the abbreviation LEIRI. > > 8. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER > > The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ > and announced at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 > > Before we go to REC, Ian Jacobs has requested that we remove > all the 'in your face' URIs from the SotD. > > > 9. XLink update. > > The earlier XLink CR was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ > > The XLink 1.1 LC was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ > and announced at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Apr/0006 > > We plan to skip CR this time. > > Paul sent out an announcement about our upcoming plans at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0081 > We should be sure XLink spells out Legacy Extended IRIs and that IRI bis mentions the abbreviation LEIRI. > Paul noted that the XML at > http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/WD-xlink11-20080331.xml > doesn't have a stylesheet PI so it doesn't really work to > try to view this document in a browser. We should be sure > to fix this for our next publication (presumably PR). We should fix this in our next publication. > > 10. XInclude 3rd Edition > > XInclude 2nd Edition is at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 > > LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition: > > 3.1, href attribute is a LEIRI > > See also 4.1.1 (details TBD) which can't reference XML 1.1 > since we don't define XML Resource Identifiers in XML 1.1. > Just replace that para with the "They are LEIRIs" para. > > See also > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0007 > for more details on the necessary changes. > > ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed > with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Mar/0052
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 15:32:04 UTC