Re: RDDL document (was: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 March 29

Grosso, Paul a écrit :
> Thank you for correcting me here.
> 
> If I've got it straight now, John is proposing replacing
> the contents of the web resource found at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
> with what's at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Mar/att-0076/
> namespace.xhtml
> 
> Any comments on this?

A couple of small issues with John's version.

1) He seems to have forgotten to change the section title "Namespace 
policy" to "Namespace change policy", as I suggested and he +1'd.

2) The rddl:resource element for BCP 47 was wrong, there was an 
xlink:role attribute pointing to the BCP instead of xlink:href.  I fixed 
that and added proper xlink:role and xlink:arcrole attributes.

Revised version attached.

-- 
François

> 
> paul
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, 2006 March 29 10:53
>> To: Grosso, Paul
>> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
>> Subject: xml: RDDL document (was: Minutes for XML Core WG 
>> telcon of 2006 March 29
>>
>> Grosso, Paul scripsit:
>>
>>>> Francois had comments:
>>>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Mar/0059
>>>> JohnC had comments:
>>>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Mar/0060
>>> NOTE:  The above comments were really about the Namespaces
>>> spec itself and should therefore be taken as PE against NS 1.0
>>> (and 1.1).
>> Actually no; they were about the RDDL document *at* the xml: namespace
>> URI, namely http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace .  We should fix this
>> and get it republished by W3C.  I've attached a proposed revision.
>>
>> (Alas, "namespace document" and "Namespace document" sound the same on
>> the phone.)
>>
>> -- 
>> John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  www.ccil.org/~cowan
>> Female celebrity stalker, on a hot morning in Cairo:
>> "Imagine, Colonel Lawrence, ninety-two already!"
>> El Auruns's reply:  "Many happy returns of the day!"
>>
> 
> 
>