RE: RDDL document (was: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 March 29

Thank you for correcting me here.

If I've got it straight now, John is proposing replacing
the contents of the web resource found at
http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
with what's at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Mar/att-0076/
namespace.xhtml

Any comments on this?  

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 2006 March 29 10:53
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: xml: RDDL document (was: Minutes for XML Core WG 
> telcon of 2006 March 29
> 
> Grosso, Paul scripsit:
> 
> > > Francois had comments:
> > > 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Mar/0059
> > > 
> > > JohnC had comments:
> > > 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Mar/0060
> > 
> > NOTE:  The above comments were really about the Namespaces
> > spec itself and should therefore be taken as PE against NS 1.0
> > (and 1.1).
> 
> Actually no; they were about the RDDL document *at* the xml: namespace
> URI, namely http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace .  We should fix this
> and get it republished by W3C.  I've attached a proposed revision.
> 
> (Alas, "namespace document" and "Namespace document" sound the same on
> the phone.)
> 
> -- 
> John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  www.ccil.org/~cowan
> Female celebrity stalker, on a hot morning in Cairo:
> "Imagine, Colonel Lawrence, ninety-two already!"
> El Auruns's reply:  "Many happy returns of the day!"
>

Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 17:14:48 UTC