RE: Extending XLink 1.0

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Wednesday, 05 January, 2005 10:23
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Extending XLink 1.0
> 
> Core,
> 
> I've corrected the typos that Paul noted and added a new change
> suggestion for new schema languages. The draft at 
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/xlink10-ext.html
> 
> has been updated.

I'd like to see the word "non-normative" (or "informative")
somewhere in point 4.  I don't want anyone getting excited
about a possibly normative RelaxNG grammar.

paul

Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 16:55:43 UTC