Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 January 5

Regrets.

Sandra
At 11:00 AM 1/3/2005, Paul Grosso wrote:

>We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday,
>January 5, from
>           08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
>           11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
>           16:00-17:00 UTC
>           16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
>           17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
>on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
>We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
>
>See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
>and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
>email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
>
>Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
>completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
>at the beginning of the call.
>
>Agenda
>======
>1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>    the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>    or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
>
>
>2. Miscellaneous administrivia.
>
>The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005
>through 4 March 2005:
>      http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html
>      http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html
>
>Unless things change (unlikely), the XML Core WG f2f meeting
>days will be Thursday and Friday, March 3rd and 4th.
>
>Register for the meeting at:
>http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/
>
>Register at the hotel:
>http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html#Venue.
>The negotiated room rate at the meeting hotel, Hyatt Harborside,
>http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml is $139 (plus 12.45%
>tax); this discount rate expires 5 February 2005.
>
>ACTION: Norm will try to set up a meeting time with the TAG
>during the Tech Plen week in case we have something to discuss
>with them by then.
>
>
>2.5  All XML Activity WGs have been asked to review
>   QA Framework: Specification Guidelines
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
>whose Last Call Ends 28 January 2005.
>
>Are there any volunteers to make such a review and
>report back to the WG?
>
>
>3.  XLink update.
>
>Norm posted a draft[10] with diff[11]; there has been
>some discussion[12].
>
>We will have to make it an XLink 1.1, and we need to make a
>charter change.
>
>The XML CG suggested that someone (SVG or XML Core)
>write a WG Note that effectively outlines the desired changes
>to XLink.  Then, we can put through an XML Core WG charter
>change that allows us specifically to issue an XLink 1.1 that
>implements the changes in the Note.
>
>We decided to develop a WG Note "Extending XLink 1.0"
>that lists the changes we suggest to XLink 1.0.
>
>ACTION to Norm:  Draft such a WG Note.
>
>
>4. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
>    published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC
>    Potential Errata (PE) document is [7].
>
>PE 135, 136, and 137 are in countdown until this week's telcon.
>
>
>5. Namespaces in XML.
>
>   Ongoing ACTION to Richard:  Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed.
>
>Paul checked with W3C folks about whether we can
>fold editorial errata from 1.1 back into 1.0 2nd Ed
>and our plan is acceptable:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0041
>
>Richard pointed out a namespace comment at
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2004Dec/0000
>which requests something which is almost a different kind of schema.
>
>
>6. Xinclude Rec was published 2004 December 30 at:
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/
>
>The DIWG sent email about XInclude--see
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Dec/0009
>and a fair amount of follow up in the December WG archives.
>Is there any more we feel we should do/say as a WG on this?
>
>It has been brought to my attention that we apparently failed
>to look at the public XInclude comments list for comments
>received during the PR review which is basically the October
>archives for this list:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-xinclude-comments/2004Oct/
>We will treat these are errata.
>
>Do we have any volunteers to be editor of the XInclude errata process?
>
>
>7. xml:id.
>
>Our Last Call of xml:id is published at
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xml-id-20041109/
>The Last Call review will have ended by this week's telcon.
>
>The (public) xml:id LC issues is at:
>http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/lc-status/status-report.html
>
>ACTION to Norm:  Update it to reflect followup email by this week's
>telcon when we will start going through the issues.
>
>
>paul
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
>[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
>[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Dec/0020
>[7]
>http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html
>[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
>[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata
>[10] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/
>[11] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/diff.html
>[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0057

Sandra I. Martinez
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970,
Gaithersburg, Md. 20899

(301) 975-3579
sandra.martinez@nist.gov

Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 15:20:24 UTC