Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 January 5

We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, 
January 5, from
          08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
          11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
          16:00-17:00 UTC
          16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
          17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .

See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.

Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
at the beginning of the call.

Agenda
======
1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
   the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
   or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).


2. Miscellaneous administrivia.

The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005
through 4 March 2005:
     http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html
     http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html 

Unless things change (unlikely), the XML Core WG f2f meeting 
days will be Thursday and Friday, March 3rd and 4th.

Register for the meeting at: 
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/

Register at the hotel: 
http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html#Venue. 
The negotiated room rate at the meeting hotel, Hyatt Harborside, 
http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml is $139 (plus 12.45% 
tax); this discount rate expires 5 February 2005.

ACTION: Norm will try to set up a meeting time with the TAG 
during the Tech Plen week in case we have something to discuss 
with them by then.


2.5  All XML Activity WGs have been asked to review
  QA Framework: Specification Guidelines 
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
whose Last Call Ends 28 January 2005.

Are there any volunteers to make such a review and
report back to the WG?


3.  XLink update.

Norm posted a draft[10] with diff[11]; there has been 
some discussion[12].

We will have to make it an XLink 1.1, and we need to make a
charter change.  

The XML CG suggested that someone (SVG or XML Core)
write a WG Note that effectively outlines the desired changes
to XLink.  Then, we can put through an XML Core WG charter
change that allows us specifically to issue an XLink 1.1 that
implements the changes in the Note.

We decided to develop a WG Note "Extending XLink 1.0"
that lists the changes we suggest to XLink 1.0.

ACTION to Norm:  Draft such a WG Note.


4. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
   published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC
   Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. 

PE 135, 136, and 137 are in countdown until this week's telcon.


5. Namespaces in XML.

  Ongoing ACTION to Richard:  Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed.

Paul checked with W3C folks about whether we can
fold editorial errata from 1.1 back into 1.0 2nd Ed
and our plan is acceptable:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0041

Richard pointed out a namespace comment at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2004Dec/0000
which requests something which is almost a different kind of schema.


6. Xinclude Rec was published 2004 December 30 at:
   http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/

The DIWG sent email about XInclude--see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Dec/0009
and a fair amount of follow up in the December WG archives.
Is there any more we feel we should do/say as a WG on this?

It has been brought to my attention that we apparently failed
to look at the public XInclude comments list for comments
received during the PR review which is basically the October
archives for this list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-xinclude-comments/2004Oct/
We will treat these are errata.  

Do we have any volunteers to be editor of the XInclude errata process?


7. xml:id.

Our Last Call of xml:id is published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xml-id-20041109/
The Last Call review will have ended by this week's telcon.

The (public) xml:id LC issues is at:
http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/lc-status/status-report.html

ACTION to Norm:  Update it to reflect followup email by this week's 
telcon when we will start going through the issues.


paul

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Dec/0020
[7]
http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata
[10] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/
[11] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/diff.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0057

Received on Monday, 3 January 2005 16:00:34 UTC