Re: Another updated xml:id specification

Ok. Updated.

/ John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh scripsit:
|
|> I've updated the xml:id specification per our discussions at the XML
|> Core WG telcon today:
|> 
|>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xmlid/xml-id.html
|
| Thanks for the quick turnaround, Norm.  A few editorial notes:
|
| 1) The must-within-must and must-within-should wording in section 4
|    is confusing.  I suggest the following:
|
| An xml:id processor must assure that the following statements hold for
| all xml:id attributes:
|
|     * The normalized value of each xml:id attribute is a valid NCName.
|     * If the type of an xml:id attribute is specified using a validation
|       technology, the type is 'ID'.
|
| An xml:id processor should assure that the following statement holds
| for xml:id attributes:
|
|     * All values of type )B�ID� within a document are unique.  
|
| 2) The "Strictly speaking" in the definition of validation is a hangover from
|    earlier drafts, and the definition of validation isn't actually marked up as
|    a definition.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.