Re: Updating XLink?

/ Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com> was heard to say:
|> It seems like a simple, easy change to make in a 1.1 spec. That
|> probably means it's impossible :-), but does anyone else have the will
|> to try?
|
| I would feel that it's the right thing to do technically, but politically:
|   - Are we (Core WG) responsible for XLink ? 

I believe we are.

|   - Do we really want to reopen this, I already see the namespace prefix
|     question raised again ! The scars are not fully healed yet from my 
|     perspective...

That's why I'm asking :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.