- From: Sandra Martinez <sandra.martinez@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:15:47 -0500
- To: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
I will have to leave the meeting at 11:30 a.m. Regrets for the remaining half. Sandra At 12:01 PM 11/1/2004, Paul Grosso wrote: >We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, >November 3, from > 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka > 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka > 16:00-17:00 UTC > 16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK > 17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe >on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. >We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . > >[For those wondering, the switch from daylight savings time >to standard time occurred on October 31st for the home locale >of everyone on the WG.] > >See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents >and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please >email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. > >Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and >completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it >at the beginning of the call. > >Agenda >====== >1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > > >2. Miscellaneous administrivia. > >The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005 >through 4 March 2005: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html > >The meeting will be held in the Hyatt Harborside, Boston: > http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml > >Chairs are sending in expectations this week. > >The XML Activity will be asking that XSL and Query meet >Monday, Tuesday of the week and that XML Core and XML Schema >will meet Thursday and Friday, with the Plenary on Wednesday. > >Please try to have some idea (e.g., at the 75% confidence level) >as to whether you expect to attend or not by this week's telcon. > > >3. Problem with xml:space in the Schema document for the XML namespace > >Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org> sent us email on this at: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0019 > >CONSENSUS to remove the default for xml:space from the schema >for the xml namespace. > >Henry has installed the updated XSD (that also has xml:id) at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd > http://www.w3.org/2004/10/xml.xsd > >There are a few more things to do to clean this up; per Henry: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0035 >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0036 > >ACTION to Henry: Complete clean up of xml namespace documents >and reply to Michael cc-ing XML Core. > > >4. XML errata. The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the > published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC > Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. > >PE 133 CDATA sections, PIs and Comments in Mixed and ANY content models >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >CONSENSUS to approve and publish. >ACTION to Francois: Update PE and Errata documents for PE 133. > >PE 134 Non-ascii chars in XML/text declaration >---------------------------------------------- >The xml-editor list received a comment at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2004OctDec/0003 >which is presumably asking the same question asked earlier at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2003OctDec/0048 >and which the commenter claims we never answered satisfactorily. > >We had a proposed resolution at >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata#PE134 >but the commentor came back at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2004Oct/0131 >thereby requiring Francois to update the rationale. > >ACTION to Francois: Update the rationale and restart the countdown. > > >PE132 Validity of default attribute values (again) >-------------------------------------------------- >This comes down to the wording in section 3.3.2 where we say >"only the syntactic constraints of the type are required here" >but then we argued about what "syntactic" means. > >CONSENSUS: It is a violation of the Attribute Default Legal VC >for the default value not to be one of those specified in the >enumerated list for enumerated type attributes. > >ACTION to John: Propose new language for "Validity constraint: >Attribute Default Legal" to solve the ambiguity here. > > >5. Namespaces in XML. > > ACTION to Richard: Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed. > > >6. Xinclude PR was published Sept 30 at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-xinclude-20040930/ > and announced to the AC at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2004JulSep/0043 > > The AC review closed October 29. Henry, let us know if you > have any status on the review. > >Sandra has added ERH's tests to the CVS of the XInclude Test Suite. >We will plan to update the tar and zip (and test suite home page) >after the PR ends and we are ready to publish the Rec. > > >7. xml:id. > >The Last Call ready draft (of Oct 27 though dated Nov 9) is at >http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xmlid/xml-id.html >This includes rewrites coming out of last week's telcon and >is therefore the version we plan to approve for publication! >READ IT before the call and be prepared to vote for publication. > >We will now shoot for WG approval THIS WEEK, Nov 9th pubdate, >Nov 11-12 for the pub request, but still 2004 Dec 13 end of >LC period. > >ACTION to Norm: Update the last para of the Status to indicate >that this document is under the newer PP IP policy. > >The (public) xml:id issues is at: >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/wd-status/status-report.html >[Not up to date as of the writing of this agenda, but >all issues are closed.] > >ACTION to Norm: Update the xml:id issues document. > >Norm announced he had a sax filter implementation of xml:id: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0042 > > >8. XML Profile. The TAG (via Norm) asks about progress on this: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Sep/0004 > >We last talked about this at the March 2004 f2f: >http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/02/xml-f2f-20040301-minutes#profile > >Norm continues to recommend that we make a profile that is the >same as XML 1.1 except to change the bnf so that you can't have >any sort of doctype decl. > >Norm suggests we generate a WG Note outlining the subset. > >Glenn asks about how this might affect the idea of a >compliant XML processor. Specifically, a processor that >only processes this subset is not a compliant XML processor. > >SOAP also forbids PIs, but we believe they can live with a >subset with PIs. > >ACTION to Norm: Send email summarizing his suggested plan >(though the ACTION below to check with the TAG should probably >come first). > >Norm started a TAG discussion at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Oct/0059 >but reached no denouement. > >ACTION to Norm: Check with the TAG that this is something >they still want to see worked on. > >The next step would seem to be to write a summary of the >plan and send it out and see if it makes people happy. >We should be sure to include at least the TAG, SOAP, the >XML CG. > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core >[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks >[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0038 >[7] >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html >[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata >[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata Sandra I. Martinez National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899 (301) 975-3579 sandra.martinez@nist.gov
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:16:41 UTC