- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:54:00 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: public-xhtml2@w3.org, ishida@w3.org, fd@w3.org
Le mercredi 21 janvier 2009 à 08:36 -0600, Shane McCarron a écrit : > Actually, I don't think we can. Putting @lang into XHTML 1.1 or XHTML > Basic 1.1 or XHTML Print 1.0 would change the conformance requirements > on currently conforming user agents. Indeed, but I think the cost of making that change (i.e. go through the Proposed Edited Recommendation process) is lesser than the cost of not making it - that is putting millions of authors in having to choose between: * creating valid content * serving content that can be view with the most widely available browser today * serving content that can be properly language-annotated Dom
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2009 14:54:28 UTC