- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:01:21 +0100 (CET)
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- cc: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
On 7 Jan, Shane McCarron wrote:
> As a quick follow up to this - I actually believe that the current RFC
> does a decent job of dealing with this. See
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt section 8. We are not using it, but
> that doesn't mean it is wrong.
Agreed. It appears quite clear. Why are we raising the issue at this
particular time?
--
- Tina Holmboe siteSifter Greytower Technologies
http://www.sitesifter.co.uk http://www.greytower.net
Website Quality and Accessibility Testing
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 17:01:56 UTC