- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:37:10 +0200
- To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Cc: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 28 Oct 2011, at 12:04, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote: > On 28.10.2011 11:51, Henry Story wrote: >> I agree that sadly there are not many complete N3 parsers, so we should use turtle. > May I add the action: remove N3 references in spec? yes from me. > >> Now you want one more, that is not standard. > It will be standard. It is going to be one of four official serializactions of RDF model (near RDFa, RDF/XML and Turtle[and N-Triples]). Additionally, it just optional serialization. > But I'm not stubborn on this issue ;) I think we should wait till they are standard or until we can prove a large number of people support it. So earl implementations will help for that. > >>> 3. I suggest to change Turtle references to more actual [2] >> >> that's a good idea > May I add the action: change Turtle reference in spec? yes from me. But we should have a few other people chime in. > > Best, > Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 10:37:52 UTC