- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:20:08 +0200
- To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Cc: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 21 Apr 2011, at 16:43, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote: > On 21.04.2011 12:51, Henry Story wrote: >> New version with some changes: >> >> http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/04/21/ > My cursory commands: > 1. section 2 - point 1 - noted that this is Alice's protected HTTPS resource. It will be clearer. > 2. section 2 - point 2 - as above (resource server -> Alice's resource server) > 3. section 2 - fig 1. - IMHO Alice's Web Server -> Alice's Web Application Web Server > 4. section 2 - point 5 - remove link https://bob.net/is/bob (it links nowhere) > 5. section 2 - last paragraph https -> HTTPS > 6. section 2 - URL -> URI (... can be an HTTPS URI...) > 7. section 3 - IMHO subsection 3.3 should be 3.2 (3.2 TLS, 3.3 Comparison to OpenID) > 8. subsection 3.3 https -> HTTPS > 9. subsection 3.3 title TLS -> Transport Layer Security Ok for most of the above. I think Web Application Server is better than resource server but might as well just stick to Web Server and save a word when we are speaking of URLs we might as well use the world, instead of going through the superclass and then restricting it. :-) > 10. document is not valid (I can fix it) [1] Thanks. I'll let you look at that when we are closer to the end, so that we don't need to do it twice. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/#paper > > Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 15:20:39 UTC