W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > April 2011

RE: Position Paper for W3C Workshop on Identity

From: peter williams <home_pw@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:51:53 -0700
Message-ID: <SNT143-ds47658DF97F48B0AAA5C9F92930@phx.gbl>
To: "'Henry Story'" <henry.story@bblfish.net>, <jeff@sayremedia.com>
CC: "'WebID XG'" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
So , its short and pithy. Its not overly biased, and it makes a case.

It *does* make me want to know more. I wish it gave me some hints of the
answers, just so that as a reviewer I might stack it higher in my choice
list - and not be tempted to downgrade it when I read the next submission.

It's well written. 

It makes various claims that are hard to substantiate, but they were not
religiously characterized. They were hopeful. It didn't promise the earth,
and only once implied that browsers need to have RDF parsers. (That is
probably is weakest point, politically, as its walking right into the rats
nest of RDF history). I have to leave it to other judgements whether we
REALLY need that point. IN my world, that just gives the competing salesman
an angle of attack...

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xg-webid-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-webid-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Henry Story
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:25 PM
To: jeff@sayremedia.com
Cc: WebID XG
Subject: Re: Position Paper for W3C Workshop on Identity

Ok the latest version of the paper for the W3C Browser workshop has been put
up here:


It should be an easy and clear read, and essentially make the point to the
browser vendors that they need very little effort to make a big difference
and solve a big problem.


Social Web Architect
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 20:52:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:44 UTC