- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:25:49 -0400
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 4/19/11 4:46 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > [snip] > > For the sake of all our inboxes, can this lengthy discussion be turned > into discussion of proposed text for a WebID specification? > > For example, who can live with: > > "A WebID is a URI (IRI, technically). Although the basic operation of > the protocol is applicable to any URI scheme for which there is some > practical notion of 'de-reference'[1], initial implementors have found > most interoperability through using the common http and https > schemes." > I don't particular care for this text. But I care to see people > arguing productively, and that's more likely when we keep our eyes on > the prize... +1 > I suggest an analogy with HTML's<img> tag; somehow the market settles > on conventions for what to point to, without the spec having to > dictate particular versions of particular allowed formats. +1 Kingsley > cheers, > > Dan > > issue: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/55 > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#dereference-uri > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:26:11 UTC