- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 23:44:43 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 22:46 +0200, Dan Brickley wrote: > [snip] > > For the sake of all our inboxes, can this lengthy discussion be turned > into discussion of proposed text for a WebID specification? > > For example, who can live with: > > "A WebID is a URI (IRI, technically). Although the basic operation of > the protocol is applicable to any URI scheme for which there is some > practical notion of 'de-reference'[1], initial implementors have found > most interoperability through using the common http and https > schemes." > Finally something that makes sense. +1 > I don't particular care for this text. But I care to see people > arguing productively, and that's more likely when we keep our eyes on > the prize... > > I suggest an analogy with HTML's <img> tag; somehow the market settles > on conventions for what to point to, without the spec having to > dictate particular versions of particular allowed formats. > > cheers, > > Dan > > issue: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/55 > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#dereference-uri >
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:45:20 UTC