- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:45:47 -0400
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 4/19/11 2:56 PM, Nathan wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> Not knowing how to deal with URI type (scheme) != a valid or invalid >> WebID. Today, code is emerging that takes the view that WebIDs that >> aren't HTTP scheme based == invalid. > > That's a very valid point, mapping to well defined protocols and > encouraging (or expecting) their use is one thing, but precluding all > schemes bar one really isn't a wise move, even just for the sake of > future proofing the thing! > > Fully agree w/ the approach you outline above kinglsey, if you don't > understand the scheme you simply don't know if it's a webid, nothing > more, nothing less. Thanks for groking what real openness is about. Kingsley > > Best, > > Nathan > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 19:46:09 UTC