W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > April 2011

Re: self-signed

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:56:13 +0100
Message-ID: <4DADDACD.7050003@webr3.org>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
CC: public-xg-webid@w3.org
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> Not knowing how to deal with URI type (scheme) != a valid or invalid 
> WebID. Today, code is emerging that takes the view that WebIDs that 
> aren't HTTP scheme based == invalid.

That's a very valid point, mapping to well defined protocols and 
encouraging (or expecting) their use is one thing, but precluding all 
schemes bar one really isn't a wise move, even just for the sake of 
future proofing the thing!

Fully agree w/ the approach you outline above kinglsey, if you don't 
understand the scheme you simply don't know if it's a webid, nothing 
more, nothing less.


Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 18:57:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:44 UTC