- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:56:13 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: public-xg-webid@w3.org
Kingsley Idehen wrote: > Not knowing how to deal with URI type (scheme) != a valid or invalid > WebID. Today, code is emerging that takes the view that WebIDs that > aren't HTTP scheme based == invalid. That's a very valid point, mapping to well defined protocols and encouraging (or expecting) their use is one thing, but precluding all schemes bar one really isn't a wise move, even just for the sake of future proofing the thing! Fully agree w/ the approach you outline above kinglsey, if you don't understand the scheme you simply don't know if it's a webid, nothing more, nothing less. Best, Nathan
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 18:57:03 UTC