Re: RE: Re: a totally minimal RDFa doc, please

Hi Peter,

There are some strange control characters at the start of your stream.

If you do a wget you see them. Maybe that?

357 273 277   <   !   D   O   C   T   Y   P   E       h   t   m

Browsers maybe be more tolerant. Or you dare I say you are indeed a victim
of  MITM.

Good luck.


On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:58 PM, peter williams <home_pw@msn.com> wrote:

> That what I did. I copied your page, byte for byte, from a socket spy.
> Perhaps I changed a byte too many and upset a (unwebby) ultra fussy syntax?
>
>
>
> The only thing I changed in the graph part was the about ref, and the
> cert:id. I only did that after it didn’t work when simply hosting your page
> with no change (hoping it was an RDF issue…)
>
>
>
> http://home.homepw2.operaunite.com/webserver/content/index.html
>
>
>
> Im **guessing** that what the browser sees is NOT what the server http
> client sees (be it an extractor client, or uriburner client). There are
> definitely redirects and cookies and other stuff going on,  when I spy on
> the handoffs. What the betting that the average resource server is not going
> to be willing to leverage these “browser” centric features of the endpoint?
>
>
>
> If I invoke the extractor, it seems to analyze some intermediate page.
>
>
>
> Im trying really hard to use consumer stuff (and not run a webserver).
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* akkiehossain@gmail.com [mailto:akkiehossain@gmail.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Akbar Hossain
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:52 AM
> *To:* peter williams
> *Cc:* mail@akbarhossain.com; WebID XG
> *Subject:* Re: RE: Re: a totally minimal RDFa doc, please
>
>
>
> Peter,
>
> If you run your page thru the rdfa distiller there is no key. Perhaps copy
> my page without too many edits first.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 14 Apr 2011 15:38, "peter williams" <home_pw@msn.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Almost perfect – in that there is (i) total minimum of markup, (ii)
> anyone can understand that, and (iii) a lovely rdfa extractor proves its
> viable.
> >
> >
> >
> > So, I stuff a variant on
> http://home.homepw2.operaunite.com/webserver/content/#<http://home.homepw2.operaunite.com/webserver/content/>… and the extractor doesn’t work! I guess uriburner wont work either, for
> some a related (unknown) reasons.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sigh.
> >
> >
> >
> > But thanks. It’s the right idea.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: public-xg-webid-request@w3.org [mailto:
> public-xg-webid-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Coralie Mercier
> > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:53 AM
> > To: WebID XG
> > Subject: Fwd: Re: a totally minimal RDFa doc, please
> >
> >
> >
> > [Messages from "Akbar Hossain" <mail@akbarhossain.com> seem to not end
> up on the public-xg-webid@w3.org list and archive. I'm investigating.
> Meanwhile, I'm forwarding the message to the list.]
> >
> > ------- Forwarded message -------
> > From: "Akbar Hossain" <mail@akbarhossain.com>
> > To: "peter williams" <home_pw@msn.com>
> > Subject: Re: a totally minimal RDFa doc, please
> > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:23:04 +0200
> >
> > Perhaps look at the source of my home page. http://akbarhossain.com/
> >
> > You could remove the rdfa validator link, the email verifier link and pem
> converter.
> > Maybe make the cert details non visible elements of the page ...
> > Endless possibilities.
> >
> > (I generated the page from the second tab of http://x509.me
> > The test a certificate option. My cert was generated of the first page
> (optional). My cert had a SAN pointing to a blank page to start with. Press
> the test button on the second tab. It fails as it was a blank page and spits
> out the rdfa required for it to pass. Cut, copy, paste.)
> >
> > Hope that helps.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On 14 Apr 2011 05:07, "peter williams" <home_pw@msn.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Coralie Mercier - Communications Team - Incubator Activity Lead
> > World Wide Web Consortium - http://www.w3.org
> > W3C/ERCIM - N212 - 2004, rte des lucioles - 06410 Biot - FR
> > mailto:coralie@w3.org +33492387590 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
> >
>