- From: <P.Barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:18:31 +0100
- To: <simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, <Michael.Compton@csiro.au>, <public-xg-ssn@w3.org>
I hope that I have understood it correctly; Can we use a part of NASA's SWEET ontology for the units of measurement? Best regards, Payam ________________________________________ From: public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org [public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Simon Cox [simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu] Sent: 23 June 2010 13:59 To: Michael.Compton@csiro.au; public-xg-ssn@w3.org Subject: RE: operating and survival conditions What is the rationale behind URLs like http://purl.oclc.org/NET/muo/ucum/unit/temperature/degree-Celsius ? 1. It appears that the project that set this up stopped in 2008 2. It doesn't appear to offer any real semantic value - the RDF seems to be confined to rdf:type information, which doesn't get you far. No definitions, conversions, or even links to more authoritative definitions. 3. The slash URI ultimately maps to a # URI, which implies a finite set in a primary-resource, which is not scalable for an unbounded set like units of measure. (Compare this with the OGC URI scheme, which allows any terminal symbol that can be constructed following the UCUM algorithm - i.e. it effectively delegates the detail to UCUM. ) 4. I'm a bit baffled why they call it 'ucum' but then do *not* use the symbols defined in UCUM I fully agree that an authoritative source of URIs for units and quantities is required, but submit that this is a poor choice. -------------------------------------------------------- Simon Cox European Commission, Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit, TP 262 Via E. Fermi, 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy Tel: +39 0332 78 3652 Fax: +39 0332 78 6325 mailto:simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/simon-cox SDI Unit: http://sdi.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ IES Institute: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ JRC: http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ -------------------------------------------------------- Any opinions expressed are personal unless otherwise indicated. -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael.Compton@csiro.au Sent: Tuesday, 22 June 2010 15:00 To: public-xg-ssn@w3.org Subject: operating and survival conditions I've marked up Payam's suggestion for operating and survival conditions into an OWL file (as an extension of the current version of the ontology). See http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Operating_Model I hope I've interpreted it properly. All comments welcome - Payam, if you see anything amiss let me know. On the same page is an example that encodes the operating and survival conditions for a sensor. Both files are attached here. Michael
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 13:21:15 UTC