- From: Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:53:20 +0200
- To: <public-xg-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A479FBD1AC3C45F2A1D0377058CD5821@T60>
I was asking myself, when populating the list of 30 popular community services: What defines (for those of us in this W3C XG) a service as being unequivocally on the list and why? Do we all have the same definition of social networking? Judging from the services on the first list on this wiki page [1], probably not. I suggest that we take a stab at a W3C Social Web XG 'accepted' definition of scope. Playing the devils' advocate here: One of the problems with a public/published W3C definition of "social web" or "social networking" is that it may need to be examined regularly and modified/updated. Where will the boundaries every end? Social networking ("community") features are beginning to permeate many other (previously non social) digital services. There are already and will be more social "features" added to everything. Some examples: + a music (or any entertainment content) service where people rate the tunes, movies, etc + a weather service in which you can see the weather near your friends, + a local nightclub search service on which you see where your friends have already congregated, + an auction service on which your friends or taste neighbors offer opinions/advice before you conclude a purchase Take this out into the distance and what you have is an infinite list of socially-aware services. Everything is social... [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/TopSocialNetworkingSites Christine Spime Wrangler <mailto:cperey@perey.com> cperey@perey.com mobile (Swiss): +41 79 436 68 69 from US: +1 (617) 848 8159 from anywhere (Skype): Christine_perey
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 13:54:00 UTC