- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:47:47 -0500
- To: Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- CC: public-xg-rdb2rdf <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org>
On 1/10/09 9:38 AM, Sören Auer wrote: > > Hi all, > > as much as I remember we did so far only discuss the mapping from RDB > to RDF. In certain settings it might, however, also make sense to be > able to update the RDB using SPARUL [1]. This might of course be > pretty difficult and not even possible in the general case. In the DB > community there is quite some work about updateable views and some > DBMS even support them - if our mapping would be able to distinguish > between mappings which represent updateable views and those which > don't we would get (partial) updateability for free. > Maybe this is to much to be discussed now in the XG or to be added as > a requirement to the recommendation (or shall we?) - but probably > worth keeping in mind once a WG was chartered. > > Have a nice weekend everybody, > > Sören > > > [1] http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/SPARQL-Update.html > > Soren, We are certainly working on update-able Views. We've always implemented our Rdb3Rdf mapping using Views as the underlying metaphor. Ivan can discuss this further with the group if need be. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Saturday, 10 January 2009 16:48:25 UTC