- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:26:26 -0800
- To: Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- CC: public-xg-rdb2rdf <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org>
Hi Soeren: This is an important area but I think we should wait until the WG starts and then add this an a requirement. If we add it to our final report we risk diluting our message. All the best, Ashok Sören Auer wrote: > > Hi all, > > as much as I remember we did so far only discuss the mapping from RDB > to RDF. In certain settings it might, however, also make sense to be > able to update the RDB using SPARUL [1]. This might of course be > pretty difficult and not even possible in the general case. In the DB > community there is quite some work about updateable views and some > DBMS even support them - if our mapping would be able to distinguish > between mappings which represent updateable views and those which > don't we would get (partial) updateability for free. > Maybe this is to much to be discussed now in the XG or to be added as > a requirement to the recommendation (or shall we?) - but probably > worth keeping in mind once a WG was chartered. > > Have a nice weekend everybody, > > Sören > > > [1] http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/SPARQL-Update.html >
Received on Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:27:55 UTC