- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:37:44 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
That seems alright, Jodi! I can also live with some stuff not being spelled out, really :-) Thanks, Antoine > > On 15 Sep 2011, at 17:21, Antoine Isaac wrote: > >> Ok, trying it... >> >> >>> * I'm not sure what this means: >>> "Although ULAN not yet published as Linked Data per se, it does appears in the [http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#VIAF_.28Virtual_International_Authority_File.29|VIAF]." >> >> >> ULAN data has been included in VIAF. So ULAN available via VIAF, in a way... > > I modified this to > "Although ULAN not yet published as Linked Data per se, it is included in the VIAF <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#VIAF_.28Virtual_International_Authority_File.29> as the Getty Research Institute's contribution." > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6560&oldid=6559 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6560&oldid=6559> > > Feel free to fix that! > >> >> >>> * What does "their own" refer to here? >>> "In addition to the documentation made available on their own websites, the reader can view their content using generic ontology creation and visualization tools such as [http://protege.stanford.edu/ Protégé], the [http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/browser/ Manchester ontology browser], [http://pellet.owldl.com/owlsight/ OWL Sight] or the [http://lode.sourceforge.net/ Live OWL Documentation Environment (LODE)]" >> >> >> "the websites of these vocabularies" > > Ah. > > How about this? > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6559&oldid=6557 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6559&oldid=6557> > > In addition to the documentation provided by its maintainers, an ontology can also be viewed using generic ontology creation and visualization tools such as Protégé <http://protege.stanford.edu/>, the Manchester ontology browser <http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/browser/>, OWL Sight <http://pellet.owldl.com/owlsight/> or the Live OWL Documentation Environment (LODE) <http://lode.sourceforge.net/> (see for example the Description of a Project (DOAP) ontology rendered in LODE <http://lode.sourceforge.net/http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap>). > >> >> >>> ACRONYMS >>> * Does NACO stand for "name authority component"? Should we spell that out? > > Ok--so Name Authority Component (NACO) Authority File? Or is that redundant? > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6561&oldid=6560 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6561&oldid=6560> > >>> * Does TELplus stand for The European Library plus? >> >> >> Yes >> >>> Should we spell that out? >> >> >> I don't know. It reads really weird spelled out. > > Ok, I'll leave TELplus. :) > >> >> >>> * What is the correct name for MARC21? MAchine-Readable Cataloging21? >>> * When should DC be abbreviated? >>> * Should API be spelled out? > > Still looking for opinions on these three > > >>> * Does SKOS-XL have a long name? >> >> >> No (unless you spell out SKOS, but then it will look ugly) > > I followed Marcia's suggestion. >> >> >>> * Ditto for OWL-DL? >> >> >> Ditto > > Hmm-- since we spelled out SKOS-XL, maybe OWL-Description Logic (OWL-DL)? > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6564&oldid=6563 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6564&oldid=6563> > >> >> >>> * Does LOCAH have a long name? >>> * Does SPECTRUM have a long name? > > Still waiting for opinions on these two. :) > >>> >>> STRUCTURAL STUFF >>> * "As of the winter of 2011," "It contains terms in 24 languages (as of May 2011)." >>> Do we want to say "As of the date of this report"? >> >> >> Yes. > > Ok -- fixed in two places: > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6563&oldid=6561 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6563&oldid=6561> > > > >> >> >>> >>> * It's a little strange that the usage examples appear before the vocabs here: >> >> >> could not find a better way... > > I don't think it needs to be changed, just struck me at the time. :) > >> >>> >>> =====Preservation vocabularies from LoC===== >>> >>> * Usage examples: [[Use Case Digital Preservation]] >>> >>> ======[http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservationEvents Preservation Events]====== >>> >>> A concept scheme for the preservation events, i.e., actions performed on digital objects within a preservation repository. >>> >>> ======[http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservationLevelRole Preservation Level Role]====== >>> >>> A concept scheme for the preservation level roles, i.e., values that specify in what context a set of preservation options is applicable. >>> > > -Jodi
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 07:35:31 UTC