Re: Related blog post: "We just released the MMA version of MARC21 elements and vocabularies in RDF"

On 14 Sep 2011, at 23:14, Antoine Isaac wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> OK, what I would propose is:
> 
> 1.Move MARC from the "Work in progress [...]" section into the "Metadata element sets published as RDF vocabularies" one.
> 
> 2. Replace the current text  at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#MARC
> [
> MARC has played a crucial role in the creation and exchange of library metadata. The [http://marcont.corrib.org MarcOnt initiative] has created an [http://marcont.corrib.org/ontology/marcont-2.0.owl OWL ontology] that includes [http://marcont.corrib.org/ontology/ a small sub-set of MARC elements], connected to other ontologies.
> 
> * xmlns="http://www.marcont.org/ontology/2.0#"
> * Usage examples: [[Use_Case_Archipel]]
> ]
> 
> by
> 
> [
> MARC has played a crucial role in the creation and exchange of library metadata. An [http://marc21rdf.info/ RDF version of the complete MARC 21 elements] has been published via the [http://metadataregistry.net/ Open Metadata Registry] as a "basic loss-less way to transition MARC 21 data into RDF." Prior to this, the [http://marcont.corrib.org MarcOnt initiative] had created an [http://marcont.corrib.org/ontology/ OWL ontology] that includes a small sub-set of MARC elements, related to other ontologies.
> 
> * xmlns="http://marc21rdf.info/elements/"
> * Usage examples: [[Use_Case_Archipel]]
> ]
> 
> Antoine
> 
+1

-Jodi

> 
>> Hi Antoine, I would definitely agree.
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>> I check email just a couple of times daily; to reach me sooner, click here: http://awayfind.com/jonphipps
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Hi Jon, all,
>> 
>>    This seems like a good candidate for a latest-latest moment update to http://www.w3.org/2005/__Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary___and_Dataset#MARC <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#MARC> :-)
>> 
>>    I think we could also move it away from the "work in progress" category MARC was in. Would you agree?
>> 
>>    Cheers,
>> 
>>    Antoine
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    -------- Original Message --------
>>    Subject: Related blog post: "We just released the ...
>>    Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:01:31 -0700
>>    From: Jon Phipps (Google+) <noreply-b8bfcebf@plus.google.__com <mailto:noreply-b8bfcebf@plus.google.com>>
>>    To: <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>>
>> 
>> 
>>    http://managemetadata.org/__blog/2011/09/12/elements-of-__marc21-bibliographic-standard-__represented-in-resource-__description-framework-by-__metadata-management-__associates/ <http://managemetadata.org/blog/2011/09/12/elements-of-marc21-bibliographic-standard-represented-in-resource-description-framework-by-metadata-management-associates/>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 12:35:01 UTC