Great. I added @@@CITE@@@ to the references I spotted: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Scope&diff=6355&oldid=6330 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6357&oldid=6353 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section2&diff=6358&oldid=6354 Likely not comprehensive, but hey, that's what final proofreading will be for! :) -Jodi On 9 Sep 2011, at 19:43, Karen Coyle wrote: > Yes, it will be handy to have those markers. > kc > > > Quoting Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>: > >> We refer to the Appendices several times in the main body of the main report. Do we envision having internal links to the Appendices? If so, maybe it's worth adding @@@CITE@@@ text now, so that we find all the places (I recall at least one oblique reference that might not be by name.) >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Jodi >> > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet >
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 19:11:51 UTC