Re: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?

Thanks, Jeff!

I changed the affiliation in the Executive Summary (but didn't check affiliation statements for the side deliverables)
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=ExecutiveSummary&diff=6338&oldid=6336
as well as in the list of institutions I'd mentioned:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6339&oldid=6308

-Jodi

On 9 Sep 2011, at 19:10, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:

> Jodi,
>  
> Oddly enough, our legal name may resolve this situation:
>  
> OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
>  
> It’s enough to make you wonder why our acronym isn’t OOCLC. :-)
>  
> Jeff
>  
> From: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jodi Schneider
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 2:02 PM
> To: public-xg-lld
> Subject: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?
>  
> In the Scope section, do we want to follow the capitalization we've had throughout ("library Linked Data") or use what's there now "Library Linked Data"?
>  
> Library Linked Data. "Library Linked Data" (LLD) is any type of Library Data (as defined above) that is expressed as Linked Data.
> 
> 
> I assume we also want to lowercase "library data" (rather than "Library Data") here?
> 
> 
> -Jodi

Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 18:15:32 UTC