- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:31:02 -0700
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
I can't remember what this started out as, but both "leaders" and "leadership" will probably be understood as "library directors and other management types." If we want it to mean "thought leaders" or "technology leaders" then we'll need those adjectives to be there. IMO. kc Quoting Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: >> >I think of "leaders" not just as formal leaders, but as including, >> for example >> >"thought leaders"... >> >> To make that clear, it would have to be worded "thought leaders." > > You agree, then, that "leaders" will be read as leaders in a formal > sense, and that "leadership" is better as a heading of the section > "For library leadership"? > > Tom > > -- > Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org> > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 23:31:32 UTC