- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:56:44 -0400
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: > >I think of "leaders" not just as formal leaders, but as including, for example > >"thought leaders"... > > To make that clear, it would have to be worded "thought leaders." You agree, then, that "leaders" will be read as leaders in a formal sense, and that "leadership" is better as a heading of the section "For library leadership"? Tom -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 22:57:19 UTC