- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:23:24 -0400
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:39:14PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> I think I agree with Jodi: the technical notion of alignment (i.e., creating
> explicit links as statements) reads too limited here. I felt the looser
> meaning of "bringing into line" was more appropriate as it could cover
> technical alignment between different vocabularies, but also direct re-use of
> existing ones.
>
> By the way I've removed "standards" from the heading (now "Align library data
> with the Linked Data space"). This paragraph should not be focused on
> standards, which are the highlight of the previous section ("For Library
> standards"). Maybe this can help finding a convenient new heading, as per
> your discussion below :-)
>
> I'd follow on Jodi's proposal, and suggest: "Express library data by re-using
> or mapping to existing Linked Data vocabularies".
This is good. The point has a slightly different emphasis because it doesn't
explicitly mention standards, but as you point out, standards are indeed emphasized
in the previous section addressed to "standards bodies and participants".
Tom
--
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 15:23:56 UTC