- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:01:40 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Tom, I like your rewriting here, but I don't see where the "models" fit ? Were they even present in the first version, beside the title ? What was intended when mentionning the models here ? My librarian mind thinks about FRBR and how these experiments should help demonstrate the efficiency of the new model for building better end-user applications. If that was the intended meaning, that was *very* implicit ;-) Emma On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > >> I couldn't quite parse the heading here. Is it >> >> "Design (user stories and models) for user interfaces" - or: >> "Design (user stories) and (models for user interfaces)"? >> >> The section itself, then, did not refer either to user stories or to >> models. How about [1]: >> >> Explore potential new Linked Data-based services with experimental >> prototypes >> >> Linked Data should ultimately lead to new and better services to users >> as >> well as enabling implementers outside of libraries to create >> applications >> and services based on library data. It is too early to predict what >> new >> types of services may be developed for information discovery and use. >> Experimental services using library Linked Data should be undertaken >> in >> order to explore potential use cases and inform the direction of >> larger >> development efforts. >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_recommendations_page_take2&diff=6129&oldid=6126 >> > > > I'm not sure what the precise intention of the section was, originally. But > I prize the idea to emphasize the need to think about user-oriented > stories/scenarios/use cases/whatever, and thus keep it in the heading! > > Antoine > > >
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 11:02:09 UTC