- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:26:45 -0800
- To: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
This is my kick-off for brainstorming and key issues. I'd suggest that for the first go-round we not worry about structure or levels of granularity but just throw out ideas. I'll do my best to keep track and we can then come back and have a more coordinated discussion. Karen's list: 1) Community agreement and leadership There are many in the community who are either not interested in LLD, don't know about LLD, or who are actually opposed to LLD. At the moment, there are no centers of leadership to facilitate such a major change to library thinking about its data (although IFLA is probably the most active). 2) Funding It is still quite difficult to convince potential funders that this is an important area to be working in. This is the "chicken/egg" problem, that without something to show funders, you can't get funding. 3) Legacy data The library world has an enormous cache of data that is somewhat standardized but uses an antiquated concept of data and data modeling. Transformation of this data will take coordination (since libraries share data and systems for data creation). But before it can be transformed it needs to be analyzed and there must be a plan for converting it to linked data. (There is a need for library systems to be part of this change, and that is very complex.) 4) Openness and rights issues While linked data can be used in an enterprise system, the value for libraries is to encourage open use of bibliographic data. Institutions that "own" bibliographic data may be under constraints, legal or otherwise, that do not allow them to let their data be used openly. We need to overcome this out-dated concept of data ownership. 5) Standards Libraries need to take advantage of the economies of scale that data sharing afford. This means that libraries will need to apply standards to their data for use within libraries and library systems. You can comment on these and/or post your own. Don't think about it too hard -- let's get as many issues on the table as we can! (I did 5 - you can do any number you wish.) kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2011 17:27:19 UTC