- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:22:06 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
OK, that sounds alright! Let's forget about these comments then :-) Antoine > We modified the section on rights issues based on Adrian's comments. he was assuming that by "rights" we meant "copyright", which is not the case. The opening sentence now reads: > > "Some library data has restricted usage based on local policies, contracts and conditions, and cannot therefore be published openly." > > for example, libraries purchase bibliographic data from their book vendors, and are not allowed to share that data. > > This was his comment on para. 40 on the wiki. > > Some of his other comments go to sections that have been removed: > > sec. #26, #22 > > The remaining comments are about differentiating between linked data and open data. Tom added a statement about Open Data in the scope section. Do we think more needs to be done? > > As far as I can tell, Johann's comments were all on sections that have since been removed. (Maybe this shortens the time of the call by a few minutes :-)) > > > kc > > Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to raise the attention of the editors of the "issues" and "recommendations" parts on last-minute comments that could be relevant. >> - 5 last comments from Adrian Pohl (at the top of the list at http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/comments-by-contributor/Adrian/ ) >> - 3 comments from Johan Oomen http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/comments-by-contributor/Johan+Oomen/ >> >> They look like they can be addressed quite quickly. Perhaps they even don't apply anymore, as a result of the drastic changes in these parts of the report. But maybe that's worth a quick check! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 08:21:13 UTC