- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:19:51 +0200
- To: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- CC: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
On 01/14/2011 04:03 PM, Dan Burnett wrote: > There is no way in the survey to do that, and that is on purpose. From a > standards perspective the only difference between the two is one of > timing, and I have seen groups spend absurd amounts of time trying to > distinguish (as a group) between the two when what really matters most > is what people are willing to work on *today*. I'd be willing to work on both specs in the same time, v1, an v2 (if we'll have such), but I'd expect v1 to stabilize sooner and have implementations sooner than v2. > > Essentially anything that we do not want today will only happen in the > future if there is interest to work on it at that time. > > Now, if what you want is a way to say "we should never do that, for any > reason, at any time between now and infinity", that is a discussion that > will only be necessary if there is otherwise resounding interest in > actually doing that thing now. I am sure that a discussion will ensue in > that situation, questionnaire or no questionnaire. > > The goal here is to have a general priority ordering on which > requirements fulfill the interests of the broadest numbers of > organizations (as a proxy for the industry in general) so we can focus > on those first. Ok, sounds like I should prioritize then the requirements we need for "v1". -Olli > We can work on supporting others later (only) as there > is interest. > > -- dan > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > >> There is only a single boolean choice for each requirement. How should >> we express the distinction between "should not address" and "address >> later" (aka "do it in v2")? >> >> /Bjorn >> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote: >>> Group, >>> >>> The prioritization questionnaire is now ready and available at >>> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/45260/ReqPri02/ >>> >>> As with the earlier requirements interest questionnaire, this one >>> asks for >>> only one input per Member organization. If you are not officially a >>> member >>> of the Incubator Group, you should be :) However, in the mean time >>> you can >>> fill out the text version (linked from the page above) and send it to >>> me, >>> Michael Bodell, or the list and we will incorporate it into the results. >>> Please, only one reply per organization. >>> >>> The questionnaire is open through Wednesday of next week. If you need an >>> extension please let me know. >>> >>> -- dan >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Bjorn Bringert >> Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham >> Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ >> Registered in England Number: 3977902 > > >
Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 14:20:37 UTC