- From: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:25:36 +0000
- To: Olli@pettay.fi
- Cc: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 01/14/2011 04:03 PM, Dan Burnett wrote: >> >> There is no way in the survey to do that, and that is on purpose. From a >> standards perspective the only difference between the two is one of >> timing, and I have seen groups spend absurd amounts of time trying to >> distinguish (as a group) between the two when what really matters most >> is what people are willing to work on *today*. > > I'd be willing to work on both specs in the same time, v1, an v2 > (if we'll have such), but I'd expect v1 to stabilize sooner and have > implementations sooner than v2. > >> >> Essentially anything that we do not want today will only happen in the >> future if there is interest to work on it at that time. >> >> Now, if what you want is a way to say "we should never do that, for any >> reason, at any time between now and infinity", that is a discussion that >> will only be necessary if there is otherwise resounding interest in >> actually doing that thing now. I am sure that a discussion will ensue in >> that situation, questionnaire or no questionnaire. >> >> The goal here is to have a general priority ordering on which >> requirements fulfill the interests of the broadest numbers of >> organizations (as a proxy for the industry in general) so we can focus >> on those first. > > Ok, sounds like I should prioritize then the requirements we > need for "v1". That's my interpretation as well. >> We can work on supporting others later (only) as there >> is interest. >> >> -- dan >> >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: >> >>> There is only a single boolean choice for each requirement. How should >>> we express the distinction between "should not address" and "address >>> later" (aka "do it in v2")? >>> >>> /Bjorn >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Group, >>>> >>>> The prioritization questionnaire is now ready and available at >>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/45260/ReqPri02/ >>>> >>>> As with the earlier requirements interest questionnaire, this one >>>> asks for >>>> only one input per Member organization. If you are not officially a >>>> member >>>> of the Incubator Group, you should be :) However, in the mean time >>>> you can >>>> fill out the text version (linked from the page above) and send it to >>>> me, >>>> Michael Bodell, or the list and we will incorporate it into the results. >>>> Please, only one reply per organization. >>>> >>>> The questionnaire is open through Wednesday of next week. If you need an >>>> extension please let me know. >>>> >>>> -- dan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Bjorn Bringert >>> Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham >>> Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ >>> Registered in England Number: 3977902 >> >> >> > > -- Bjorn Bringert Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 14:26:09 UTC