Re: PLEASE READ: Requirements discussion priority

Here are the answers:

R1, 1
R2, 5
R3, 7 (if the question is about using scripts to bind the results), 2 if 
the question is about something like what X+V has.
R4, 7
R5, 7
R6, 5
R7, 6
R8, 7
R9, 4
R10, 3
R11, 4
R12, 3
R13, 3
R14, 7
R15, 1
R16, 2
R17, 7
R18, 7
R19, 1
R20, 2
R21, 1
R22, 3
R23, 6
R24, 4
R25, 4
R26, 4
R27, 7
R28, 2
R29, 7
R30, 6
R31, 7
R32, 7
R33, 7
r34, 7

U1, 6
U2, 6
U3, 4
U4, 4
U5, 6
U6, 4
U7, 3
U8, 4
U9, 5
U10, 2
U11, 3
U12, 6
U13, 4
U14, 2
U15, 4



-Olli


On 10/11/2010 02:01 PM, Dan Burnett wrote:
> Group,
>
> As Michael asked I have created a survey [1] to assess interest (by
> Organization) in discussing each of the requirements in Michael's
> document. There have been some minor suggestions on the email list to
> adjust the requirements (e.g., R8) -- please take these into account
> when filling out the survey.
>
> The purpose of the survey is to help us determine which requirements are
> of interest to the greatest number of participating organizations to
> help us focus the discussion.
>
> The survey is open through Wednesday of this week. If you expect to need
> more time let me know.
>
> -- dan
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/45260/ReqPri01/
>
>
> On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Michael Bodell wrote:
>
>> I've now taken the original collated list of 70 use cases and
>> requirements from
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Sep/0051.html
>> and created a first draft of a document that combines like use cases
>> and requirements and organizes the remaining 15 use cases and 34
>> requirements into different related sections. I've also (generously)
>> linked the requirements back to the use cases that support them. For
>> contribution I also took the style of the VBWG (everyone listed in the
>> editors section, not a separate editors and authors section),
>> appologies in advance if I missed someone, I took the people who were
>> linked in the earlier collation above (and I wasn't sure what the
>> organization was for the two people who aren't members of the XG).
>>
>> As always, if there are some use cases or requirements that could be
>> made more clear or added, that would be great.
>>
>> For a next step I've asked Dan to consider running a poll that will
>> help us prioritize the use cases and requirements so we can start by
>> focusing the discussion on the use cases and requirements that have
>> the highest priority.
>> <speech.html>
>

Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 17:53:51 UTC