Re: PLEASE READ: Requirements discussion priority

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>wrote:

> On 10/11/2010 02:01 PM, Dan Burnett wrote:
>
>> Group,
>>
>> As Michael asked I have created a survey [1] to assess interest (by
>> Organization) in discussing each of the requirements in Michael's
>> document. There have been some minor suggestions on the email list to
>> adjust the requirements (e.g., R8) -- please take these into account
>> when filling out the survey.
>>
>> The purpose of the survey is to help us determine which requirements are
>> of interest to the greatest number of participating organizations to
>> help us focus the discussion.
>>
>> The survey is open through Wednesday of this week. If you expect to need
>> more time let me know.
>>
> Sorry, I missed the questionnaire deadline.
> Any chance to keep it open for a day or two?
> If not, I'll answer in an email.
>
> Though, charter says "All technical work in this group will be conducted on
> the public mailing list public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org and at any scheduled
> teleconferences and face-to-face meetings." So we shouldn't IMO use
> members-only questionnaires.
>

Agreed.


>
>
> -Olli
>
>
>
>
>> -- dan
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/45260/ReqPri01/
>>
>>
>> On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Michael Bodell wrote:
>>
>>  I've now taken the original collated list of 70 use cases and
>>> requirements from
>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Sep/0051.html
>>> and created a first draft of a document that combines like use cases
>>> and requirements and organizes the remaining 15 use cases and 34
>>> requirements into different related sections. I've also (generously)
>>> linked the requirements back to the use cases that support them. For
>>> contribution I also took the style of the VBWG (everyone listed in the
>>> editors section, not a separate editors and authors section),
>>> appologies in advance if I missed someone, I took the people who were
>>> linked in the earlier collation above (and I wasn't sure what the
>>> organization was for the two people who aren't members of the XG).
>>>
>>> As always, if there are some use cases or requirements that could be
>>> made more clear or added, that would be great.
>>>
>>> For a next step I've asked Dan to consider running a poll that will
>>> help us prioritize the use cases and requirements so we can start by
>>> focusing the discussion on the use cases and requirements that have
>>> the highest priority.
>>> <speech.html>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>