Re: R25. It should be easy to extend the standard without affecting existing speech applications

Isn't this already (at least partially) covered by the requirement to
be able to give parameters to speech engines and requirement to support
EMMA or something similar.

But anyway, I think we should keep this requirement.


-Olli



On 11/22/2010 10:07 AM, Dan Burnett wrote:
> Group,
>
> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on
> our ranking approach [1].
>
> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and
> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 25 [2].
>
> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting.
> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming
> teleconference.
>
> -- dan
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r25
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 12:04:12 UTC