Re: R25. It should be easy to extend the standard without affecting existing speech applications

I agree with everything Olli said.

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Isn't this already (at least partially) covered by the requirement to
> be able to give parameters to speech engines and requirement to support
> EMMA or something similar.
>
> But anyway, I think we should keep this requirement.
>
>
> -Olli
>
>
>
> On 11/22/2010 10:07 AM, Dan Burnett wrote:
>>
>> Group,
>>
>> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on
>> our ranking approach [1].
>>
>> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and
>> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 25 [2].
>>
>> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting.
>> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming
>> teleconference.
>>
>> -- dan
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html
>> [2]
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r25
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Bjorn Bringert
Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham
Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ
Registered in England Number: 3977902

Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 12:21:42 UTC