- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:14:42 +0200
- To: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
R24 is not quite unclear, IMO. The requirement and explanation seem to talk about a bit different things. Yes, I think end user should be able to use speech in a hands-free mode, but "to speech-enable every aspect of a web application"? Not so sure. There are applications which will be difficult to fully speech-enable. For example some drawing app, which needs to recognize touch/mouse pressure. Sure, user could say, "draw a pixel using pressure x to (1, 1), and then a pixel using pressure y to (2, 2)", but that wouldn't be quite practical. So, I'd say keep R24 (especially with wording "should" and not "must"), but clarify the explanation somehow. -Olli On 11/22/2010 10:08 AM, Dan Burnett wrote: > Group, > > This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on > our ranking approach [1]. > > This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and > opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 24 [2]. > > Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. > Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming > teleconference. > > -- dan > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r24 > > >
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 12:15:14 UTC