- From: Michael Bodell <mbodell@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:00:32 +0000
- To: Satish Sampath <satish@google.com>, "Olli@pettay.fi" <Olli@pettay.fi>
- CC: "public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org" <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
It seems that we have consensus to leave this in as is. I'm a little unsure that it is clear to say "speech recognition errors and other non-matches" as we may want to distinguish between no matches versus no input versus actual errors (I.e., bad grammars/configuration). Perhaps we can talk about wording on the call? -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Satish Sampath Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:57 AM To: Olli@pettay.fi Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org Subject: Re: R5. Web application must be notified when speech recognition errors and other non-matches occur. Yes, keep as is. Cheers Satish On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 11/16/2010 12:53 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: >> >> Keep. >> > > Keep. > > > -Olli > > > >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Dan Burnett<dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote: >>> >>> Group, >>> >>> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based >>> on our ranking approach [1]. >>> >>> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, >>> and opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 5 [2]. >>> >>> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >>> Outstanding >>> points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming >>> teleconference. >>> >>> -- dan >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/002 >>> 4.html >>> [2] >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att >>> -0001/speech.html#r5 >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 09:01:06 UTC