- From: Michael Bodell <mbodell@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:00:23 +0000
- To: Michael Bodell <mbodell@microsoft.com>, "Olli@pettay.fi" <Olli@pettay.fi>, Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- CC: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, "public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org" <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
It seems we have consensus to leave this in as is. -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Bodell Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:59 PM To: Olli@pettay.fi; Bjorn Bringert Cc: Dan Burnett; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org Subject: RE: R7. Web application must be able to specify domain specific custom grammars. +1 for me, this seems obviously necessary. -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Olli Pettay Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 1:19 AM To: Bjorn Bringert Cc: Dan Burnett; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org Subject: Re: R7. Web application must be able to specify domain specific custom grammars. I agree. On 11/12/2010 11:07 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > Keep, no changes needed. > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Dan Burnett<dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote: >> Group, >> >> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based >> on our ranking approach [1]. >> >> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, >> and opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 7 [2]. >> >> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming teleconference. >> >> -- dan >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024 >> .html >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att- >> 0001/speech.html#r7 >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 09:01:07 UTC