RE: R7. Web application must be able to specify domain specific custom grammars.

It seems we have consensus to leave this in as is.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Bodell
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:59 PM
To: Olli@pettay.fi; Bjorn Bringert
Cc: Dan Burnett; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Subject: RE: R7. Web application must be able to specify domain specific custom grammars.

+1 for me, this seems obviously necessary.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Olli Pettay
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 1:19 AM
To: Bjorn Bringert
Cc: Dan Burnett; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Subject: Re: R7. Web application must be able to specify domain specific custom grammars.

I agree.


On 11/12/2010 11:07 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote:
> Keep, no changes needed.
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Dan Burnett<dburnett@voxeo.com>  wrote:
>> Group,
>>
>> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based 
>> on our ranking approach [1].
>>
>> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, 
>> and opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 7 [2].
>>
>> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting.  
>> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming teleconference.
>>
>> -- dan
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024

>> .html
>> [2]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-

>> 0001/speech.html#r7
>>
>>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 09:01:07 UTC