- From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 18:35:28 +0700
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKi_AEsBnS99w-7vLFtbWUupmKx17N6H31M44vE0T36zdkN8=g@mail.gmail.com>
Dear XForms Users & Steven, To share what may be inspiring (May we say what are below...?): Somewhere a city of networks, those networks of languages, ones learn on how to navigate it, how to work it out by such a strategic spatial planning: thus there is a multiplanar methodology... https://www.espacestemps.net/en/articles/strategic-navigation/ Regard, Guntur Wiseno Putra Pada Rabu, 02 Oktober 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> menulis: > Dear XFormsUsers and Steven, > > XForms, Networks of Languages, and Architecture... > > > As we are trying to say architecturally about "XForms" regarding > with"networks of languages": may we imagine such buildings "Plan of Pope > Sixtus V for Rome in Italy,1585", "Yi Yuan (Garden of Contentment) in > Suzhou, China, 19th century" and "Plan for Washington D.C., USA, 1792" with > their network configurations of the path (Ching, F.D.K, "Architecture: > Form, Space and Order", John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007, pp. 276-277)...? > > > > Regard, > Guntur Wiseno Putra > > Pada Rabu, 02 Oktober 2019, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> > menulis: > >> On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 17:32:50 +0200, Guntur Wiseno Putra < >> gsenopu@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Dear XForm Users and Steven, >> >> To share what may be inspiring: >> >> It is known that there are architectures of machines and systems >> regarding with computing technologies: does it sound fantastic if there is >> a language supporting those architectures...? --a language by which we may >> work out the architectures...? --thus we may build or renovate machines and >> systems using the language...? >> >> Of a reading, "architecture" consists elements "form", "space", and >> "order": does XForm language -- together with, if there are, XSpace and >> XOrder-- embody part of such an architectural programme...? --or at least >> potentially...? >> >> >> In XForms, the form is provided by the model, the order by the content in >> the body, and the space by the CSS. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Steven >> >> >> >> Regard, >> Guntur Wiseno Putra >> >> Pada Selasa, 01 Oktober 2019, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> >> menulis: >> >>> It struck me that we should be making a collection of references to all >>> papers about XForms. >>> >>> Please reply to this message with examples you know that should be >>> included. I will collect them all together. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Steven >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:40:30 +0200, Steven Pemberton < >>> steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >>> >>> By John Boyer. >>>> >>>> Contains an XForms implementation of quicksort. >>>> >>>> ABSTRACT >>>> It is difficult to generally compare the succinctness of declarative >>>> versus imperative programming as source code size varies. In imperative >>>> programs, basic operations have constant cost, but they >>>> tend to be more verbose than declarative programs, which increases >>>> the potential for defects. This paper presents a novel approach for a >>>> generalized comparison by transforming the problem into comparing >>>> executed code size of a benchmark imperative algorithm with >>>> a partially declarative variant of the same algorithm. This allows >>>> input size variation to substitute for source code size variation. For >>>> implementation, we use a multiparadigm language called XForms >>>> that contains both declarative XPath expressions and imperative >>>> script actions for interacting with XML data within web and office >>>> documents. A novel partially declarative variant of the quicksort is >>>> presented. Amortized analysis shows that onlyO(n) imperative actions >>>> are executed, so the expressive power of the declarative constructs is at >>>> least Ω(logn). In general, declarative constructs can >>>> have an order of magnitude expressive power advantage compared >>>> with only using basic imperative operations. The performance cost >>>> factor of the expressive power advantage was determined to be >>>> O(log2 n) based on a novel dynamic projection from the generalized tree >>>> structure of XML data to a height balanced binary tree. >>>> >>>> https://dl.acm.org/results.cfm?within=owners.owner%3DHOSTED& >>>> srt=_score&query=10.1145%2F3342558.3345397&Go.x=0&Go.y=0 >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2019 11:35:32 UTC