It occurred to me later, that if we need a separate attribute to state the state of open/closed, then we don't need a value for 'appearance' at all, since the presence of the extra attribute would already be enough... Steven On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:04:08 +0100, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> wrote: > I know we use "compact" in a few other cases, like for selection > controls (where, by the way, the selection list suggested is extremely > rarely used in user interfaces >nowadays). > > But in this case the group might not be very "compact" when open. In > fact, it can be bigger than a regular group. Something closer to the > intent would be "compactible". > > I would personally favor something more explicit. "collapsible" would > fit the bill. > > -Erik > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:43 AM Steven Pemberton > <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >> Currently, <group/> has two appearances: by default block; >> appearance="minimal" gives inline. >> >> What does anyone feel about appearance="compact" for the collapsible >> case? >> >> Steven >> >> >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:07:17 +0100, XForms Users Community Group Issue >> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> ACTION-2208: Decide on attribute for initial state of >>> appearance="collapse" >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2208 >>> >>> Assigned to: Steven Pemberton >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 09:46:21 UTC