Some suggestions:
<group state="closed">
<group state="open">
<group mode="closed">
<group mode="open">
<group state="closed">
<group state="open">
<group collapse="closed">
<group collapse="open">
<group fold="closed">
<group fold="open">
Steven
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:45:52 +0100, Steven Pemberton
<steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
> It occurred to me later, that if we need a separate attribute to state
> the state of open/closed, then we don't need a value for 'appearance' at
> all, since the presence of the >extra attribute would already be
> enough...
>
> Steven
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:04:08 +0100, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I know we use "compact" in a few other cases, like for selection
>> controls (where, by the way, the selection list suggested is extremely
>> rarely used in user interfaces >>nowadays).
>>
>> But in this case the group might not be very "compact" when open. In
>> fact, it can be bigger than a regular group. Something closer to the
>> intent would be "compactible".
>>
>> I would personally favor something more explicit. "collapsible" would
>> fit the bill.
>>
>> -Erik
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:43 AM Steven Pemberton
>> <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
>>> Currently, <group/> has two appearances: by default block;
>>> appearance="minimal" gives inline.
>>>
>>> What does anyone feel about appearance="compact" for the collapsible
>>> case?
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:07:17 +0100, XForms Users Community Group Issue
>>> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ACTION-2208: Decide on attribute for initial state of
>>>> appearance="collapse"
>>>>
>>>> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2208
>>>>
>>>> Assigned to: Steven Pemberton
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>