- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:04:09 -0500
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>,Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen <yngve@opera.com>
Received on Friday, 2 January 2009 14:05:07 UTC
Here's my stab: > Whether the site content was authenticated (e.g. server authentication via TLS) From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> To: Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen <yngve@opera.com> Cc: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Date: 12/22/2008 09:51 AM Subject: ACTION-540/ISSUE-220: Clarify "Whether the site content was authenticated" Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org Yngve, from the 10/23 minutes [1], you had misread the following text in 6.2 (additional security context): > Whether the site content was authenticated as somehow relating to HTTP authentication. I'm not entirely sure how I'd say this differently, so I'd like to bounce this action item to you. Can you suggest different text? 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wsc-wg/2008Dec/0003.html (I consider my action on this one done.) -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 2 January 2009 14:05:07 UTC