- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:02:45 -0500
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFD720D3FB.4940E3D0-ON85257532.004D220C-85257532.004D2ED4@LocalDomain>
Yes, that's what I remember that part of the discussion being about. From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> To: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Date: 12/22/2008 09:48 AM Subject: ACTION-539/ISSUE-219: Clarify in 6.2 that other sources means places other than just security indicators Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org Reviewing the 10/24 minutes [1], it seems like we agreed to change the introductory paragraph of 6.2 [2] from > Web user agents MUST provide additional security context information > as described in this section through one or more user-accessible > information sources. These information sources can be implemented in > either primary or secondary user interface. Where security context > information is provided in both primary and secondary chrome, the > presentation and semantics of the presented information MUST be > consistent. ... to: > Web user agents MUST provide additional security context information > as described in this section. Where security context information is > provided in both primary and secondary chrome, the presentation and > meaning of the presented information MUST be consistent. > Confirmation most welcome; this change is not yet in the editor's draft. 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wsc-wg/2008Dec/0004.html 2. http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#pageinfosummary -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 2 January 2009 14:03:42 UTC