Fw: Editorial Last Call Comment: RFC 3280 is obseleted ( LC-2056)


I figured this was a safe one to let fly. Any feedback on general approach 
before I start in on the others? 

fyi to those of you not subscribed to our public review list. This is what 
the tool generates, based on our input. 

----- Forwarded by Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM on 01/02/2009 11:28 AM 

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
01/02/2009 09:56 AM
Re: Editorial Last Call Comment: RFC 3280 is obseleted ( LC-2056)
Sent by:

 Dear Sam Hartman ,

The Web Security Context Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent
[1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Web Security Context: User
Interface Guidelines published on 24 Jul 2008. Thank you for having taken
the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-usable-authentication@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 26
January 2009. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.


For the Web Security Context Working Group,
Thomas Roessler
W3C Staff Contact


 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/


Your comment on 9 References:
> The July 24 user interface guidelines draft references RFC 3280 as the
> certificate and CRL profile.  This document has been obseleted by RFC
> 5280.  Having considered the changes between RFC 3280 and RFC 5280, I
> believe that the newer document would be a better reference for this
> specification.

Working Group Resolution (LC-2056):
Thank you. The change has been made in our latest editor's draft.


Received on Friday, 2 January 2009 16:32:27 UTC