Reference updates to WSC-UI

I'm going through the document before getting ready to publish as CR...  Changes made:

* The ECRYPT2006 report (which is listed in the references, but not mentioned in the text any more) is no longer available. An ECRYPT 2009 report is available. Reference updated, as it's presumably at least useful to readers of the document.

* The NESSIE report is not referenced from the text.  It seems remotely useful, but we might also drop it.

* The TWIRL and RSA Key Sizes report is no longer referenced in the text.  Reference dropped.

* The Mozilla Effective TLD service is no longer referenced in the text.  Reference dropped.

* We had RFC 2616 (HTTP) in the references, but didn't cite it from within the text.  Added a bibliography reference to the definition of "HTTP Transaction" (which is really an abuse of language, but anyway -- too late for that).

* RFC 3281 isn't cited in the text any more.  Reference dropped.

* RFC 3709 (logotypes) wasn't cited in the text.  I've added a reference to relevant mentions of logotypes.

* RFC 4254 (SSH) was referenced for key continuity management.  That text has since been dropped; removing the reference.  (We still have a few words about KCM, and reference Gutman's paper about it.)

* XMLHttpRequest and XHR level 2 had new working drafts out since our last publication. References updated.

* We reference a WCAG 2.0 Working Draft.  WCAG 2.0 is now a Recommendation; reference updated.

* We reference Whalen and Inkpen; that document isn't cited anywhere in the text.  Reference dropped.

* We reference Xia and Brustoloni; that document isn't cited anywhere in the text.  Reference dropped.

* We reference Dhamija, Ozment, Fischer (the Emperor paper), but don't cite it anywhere in the text.  Reference dropped.

* draft-gutmann-keycont is expired.  I've updated the reference to say that it's expired; I wonder if anybody wants to ping Peter about further plans or an alternative reference.  (The reference isn't normative.)

I've generally updated the references to meet the guidelines in the Manual of Style:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-section

Cheers,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Thursday, 17 December 2009 12:11:37 UTC